Drawing for ONEFORALL

USPTO serial 86783714

ONEFORALL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
OLANDRIA, WARREN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ONEFORALL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeffrey Smith

JEFFREY SMITH MILLEN, WHITE, ZELANO & BRANIGAN, P.C.2200 CLARENDON BOULEVARDSUITE 1400ARLINGTON, VA 22201

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software for controlling and maintaining health and medical information; Providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software for collecting and managing genomic and medical information; Providing a web site featuring technology that enables individuals, groups, companies, organizations, and researchers to connect and communicate regarding genomic, health and medical information; Providing medical, scientific, and research information in the field of genomic and phenotypical data; Providing an on-line searchable database in the field of medical, health and genomic information for scientific and research purposes; Providing online research and reference services via an on-line computer network for individuals, groups, companies, organizations, and researchers to communicate about medical, health and genomic information, data, and cases; Providing a web site featuring technology that enables individuals, groups, companies, organizations, and researchers to search, share and upload medical and health information including genomic and phenotypical dataACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 30, 2020MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 30, 2020ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 30, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 28, 2019EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
May 28, 2019EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
May 28, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 7, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 5, 2019EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Feb 5, 2019EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Feb 5, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 11, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 9, 2018EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Aug 9, 2018EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Aug 9, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 14, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 13, 2018EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 12, 2018AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Feb 8, 2018EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 8, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 22, 2017NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 27, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jun 27, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 7, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
May 19, 2017PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 11, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 11, 2017XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
May 11, 2017GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 11, 2017GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 11, 2017CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Dec 23, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 23, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 23, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 7, 2016ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Dec 6, 2016PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Nov 18, 2016PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 7, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 7, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 7, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 1, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 2, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 2, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 2, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 22, 2016ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Feb 16, 2016PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Feb 3, 2016PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 2, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 16, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 16, 2015XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Dec 16, 2015GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 16, 2015GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 16, 2015CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Dec 16, 2015ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Dec 15, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 15, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 16, 2015MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Oct 15, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 13, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance