Drawing for VIDEOQUEST

USPTO serial 86783948

VIDEOQUEST

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BLOHM, LINDA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VIDEOQUEST?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Douglas Eveleigh

DOUGLAS EVELEIGH ENCYCLOPAEDIA BRITANNICA, INC.325 NORTH LASALLE STREETLAW DEPT.CHICAGO, IL 60654

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
038Electronic delivery of video clips, film footage and audio data via a global computer networkACTIVE—
041Providing a website featuring non-downloadable educational video clips, film footage and audio data for use with lesson plans, classroom activities, homework assignments for the purpose of project-based learning and digital learningACTIVE—
042Providing a website featuring information in response to end-users' specific requests for digital content available over wired and wireless networks via downloadable video clips, film footage and audio dataACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 19, 2017MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 19, 2017ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 15, 2016NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 20, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Sep 20, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 31, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Aug 8, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 5, 2016XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Aug 5, 2016GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 5, 2016GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 5, 2016CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Aug 2, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 1, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 1, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 1, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 1, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 1, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 1, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 1, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 16, 2015MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Oct 15, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 14, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance