USPTO serial 86789084
AQLOUD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MARTIN, EUGENIA K
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with AQLOUD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Anne H. Peck
ANNE H. PECK Cooley Llp1299 Pennsylvania Ave NW Ste 700Washington, DC 20004-2446UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | integrated circuits; computer and electronic data storage equipment, components and devices, namely, high-speed storage subsystems for storage and backup of electronic data either locally or via a telecommunications network; computer hardware and peripherals, namely, servers, switches, routers, wireless access points and routers, cellular access points and head-ends; computer storage devices, namely, high-speed storage subsystems for storage and backup of electronic data either locally or via a telecommunications network; telecommunications equipment, namely, converters and power optimizers, switches, namely Ethernet switches and routers, none of the foregoing including computer software for use in information flow-controlling, securing, accelerating, monitoring, and managing computer network traffic and applications communicating across networks | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 15, 2017 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Nov 15, 2017 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Aug 21, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 21, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 21, 2017 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 21, 2017 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2017 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 21, 2017 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 25, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 24, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 24, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 25, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 25, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 25, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 5, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 18, 2015 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Dec 16, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 10, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 24, 2015 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 24, 2015 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Nov 24, 2015 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 21, 2015 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 19, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |