USPTO serial 86790387
PRODUCTOS ALTOS D' VALLE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AYALA, LOURDES
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PRODUCTOS ALTOS D' VALLE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ruben alcoba
3399 NW 72nd Ave Ste 211Miami, FL 33122-1343UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Bread; Bread and buns | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Del Valle Import & Export LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Del Valle Import & Export LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named PRODUCTOS ALTOS D' VALLE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 29, 2018 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 28, 2018 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 10, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2018 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 28, 2017 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 27, 2017 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Dec 27, 2017 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 27, 2017 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 27, 2017 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 27, 2017 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 25, 2017 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2017 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2017 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 5, 2017 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 17, 2017 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 17, 2017 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 27, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2017 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 25, 2017 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 25, 2016 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 30, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 30, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 10, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2016 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 19, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 19, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 19, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 14, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 8, 2016 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 1, 2016 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2016 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 1, 2016 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 18, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 17, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 17, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 16, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 16, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 16, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 16, 2016 | RFTP | REMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS | — |
| Feb 8, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 21, 2015 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 20, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |