Drawing for JUMBO

USPTO serial 86791690

JUMBO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FALK, JONATHAN ROBERT
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with JUMBO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Dennis S. Prahl

DENNIS S. PRAHL LADAS & PARRY LLP1040 AVENUE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10018UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software facilitating and managing the online sale of lottery ticketsACTIVEApr 15, 2019
042Computer programming services and computer software support services, all of the aforesaid in relation to computer software facilitating and managing the online sale of lottery ticketsACTIVEApr 15, 2019

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 10, 2020MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 10, 2020ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 22, 2019GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 22, 2019GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 22, 2019CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 1, 2019SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Oct 25, 2019IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Oct 25, 2019EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Apr 26, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 25, 2019EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Apr 23, 2019EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Apr 23, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 23, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 20, 2018EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Oct 18, 2018EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Oct 18, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 21, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 19, 2018EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Apr 19, 2018EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Apr 19, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 10, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 9, 2017EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Oct 31, 2017AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Oct 23, 2017EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Oct 23, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 22, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 20, 2017EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 20, 2017EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 20, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 25, 2016NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 13, 2016ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Mar 31, 2016ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Mar 1, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 1, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 10, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jan 23, 2016PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 14, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 11, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 11, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 9, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 21, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 17, 2015GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Dec 17, 2015GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Dec 17, 2015CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Dec 17, 2015ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Dec 16, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 16, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 22, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 22, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance