Drawing for TWINLOCK

USPTO serial 86792450

TWINLOCK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LEE, JANET H
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TWINLOCK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Cindy L. Caditz

Cindy L. Caditz Davis Wright Tremaine LLP1201 Third Avenue, Suite 2200Seattle, WA 98101-3045UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010Dual clamps securing breast milk storage bagsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 6, 2016MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Jul 6, 2016ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Jul 5, 2016EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Jun 28, 2016ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 28, 2016REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 4, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 4, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 4, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 30, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 30, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 23, 2015MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Oct 22, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 22, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance