USPTO serial 86792665
YOWL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 605
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHEN, ELIZABETH S
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with YOWL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Mateo, CA
San Mateo, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Herbert Patty
HERBERT PATTY THE LAW OFFICE OF HERBERT T. PATTY1625 THE ALAMEDASUITE 508SAN JOSE, CA 95126Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Arranging and conducting guided outdoor recreational activities, namely, excursions featuring canoeing, rafting, ballooning, snowshoeing, scuba diving, backpacking, mountaineering, nature photography walks, kayaking, hiking, hang gliding, canyoneering, spelunking, tree climbing, rappelling, sailing, camping, wildlife observation, rock climbing, orienteering, ice climbing, mountain biking, kitesurfing, skiing, surfing, windsurfing, and skydiving for recreational purposes; Arranging and conducting outdoor recreational activities in the nature of guided helicopter, airplane, sailplane, and seaplane tours for recreational purposes and not for transportation purposes; Arranging and conducting outdoor recreational activities in the nature of motorcycling expeditions for recreational purposes | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 19, 2017 | MAB5 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 19, 2017 | ABN5 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 18, 2017 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 18, 2016 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 23, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 3, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 20, 2016 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 20, 2016 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 20, 2016 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 20, 2016 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 7, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 6, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 6, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 6, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 11, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 11, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 11, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 9, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 23, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |