Drawing for 5 A 7

USPTO serial 86792711

5 A 7

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SMIGA, HOWARD
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with 5 A 7?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jane Shay Wald

JANE SHAY WALD IRELL & MANELLA LLP1800 AVENUE OF THE STARS, SUITE 900LOS ANGELES, CA 90067UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Retail store services and on-line retail store services featuring a wide range of consumer goodsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 5, 2017MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 4, 2017ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 1, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 31, 2017NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 6, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 16, 2016NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 28, 2016PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 27, 2016CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Oct 26, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 26, 2016XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Oct 26, 2016CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Oct 23, 2016ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Oct 17, 2016CHPBPOST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Oct 12, 2016APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Oct 4, 2016PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Sep 26, 2016EPPATEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Sep 19, 2016PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 6, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 31, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 31, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 17, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 10, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 10, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 9, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 9, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 24, 2015MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Oct 23, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance