USPTO serial 86792866
SIEGE TECHNOLOGIES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 5098537Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 13, 2016
- Examiner
- CHARLON, BARNEY
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SIEGE TECHNOLOGIES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Manchester, NH
Manchester, NH
Manchester, NH
TYSON'S CORNER, VA
MANCHESTER, NH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gene K. Park
Gene K. Park Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLPOne Market, Spear Street TowerSan Francisco, CA 94105-1596Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Design and development of computer software in the field of cyber security, namely, kernel level software, sub-kernel level software, software to analyze hostile code, reverse engineering software; design and development of high-speed network operating systems; computer network client and server programming; design and development of mobile operating systems and software; hypervisor design and development; design and development of boot code; design and development of firmware; design and development of root of trust technologies; design and development of computer intrusion detection systems and computer intrusion prevention systems; design and development of cyber attribution technologies for use in facilitating identification of attackers and code lineage, namely, computer software; design and development of digital signal processing applications; research, development, engineering, and testing services in the fields of cryptography, cryptanalysis, red teaming of secure computer systems, software analysis, computer code analysis, computer requirements analysis, rootkit detection and analysis, application software design, computer vulnerability research, proof-of-concept exploitation for computer system penetration testing, computer anti-tamper and software protection; consultation in the field of technology used in cyber security, namely, cyber defensive technology integration for computer network defense, penetration testing of computers and networks to assess information security vulnerability, measurement of effectiveness of cyber penetration tools, computer system vulnerability, network threat visualization tools, algorithm analysis, military systems engineering, red teaming of secure computer systems, security testing of software and embedded systems, measurement and quantification of computer security technologies, measurement and quantification of computer network and security posture, automated software and analysis systems for use in computer system penetration testing, computer system security testing, computer system stress testing, and computer system security planning, computer systems prototyping, and computer network/traffic analysis | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 15, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Siege Technologies, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Siege Technologies, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Siege Technologies, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by NEHEMIAH SECURITY, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by SIEGE TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named SIEGE TECHNOLOGIES
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 23, 2023 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Dec 13, 2021 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2020 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Mar 2, 2020 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Mar 2, 2020 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 2, 2020 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 2, 2020 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 2, 2020 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 12, 2020 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 3, 2017 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Apr 25, 2017 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 25, 2017 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 13, 2016 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 27, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 7, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 19, 2016 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 19, 2016 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2016 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2016 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 11, 2016 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2016 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 11, 2016 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 15, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 15, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 15, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 18, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 18, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 18, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 10, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 23, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 23, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |