Drawing for POWERED BY PARENTS

USPTO serial 86793989

POWERED BY PARENTS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LAVACHE, LINDA M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with POWERED BY PARENTS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Terence N. Church

TERENCE N. CHURCH LAW OFFICE OF TERENCE N. CHURCHSTE 1762400 CAMINO RAMONSAN RAMON, CA 94583

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
039Carpooling services, namely, matching drivers of motor vehicles with individuals needing ridesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 26, 2017MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 26, 2017ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 22, 2016NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 27, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Sep 27, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 7, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Aug 19, 2016PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 17, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 15, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 15, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 13, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 5, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 5, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 4, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 4, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 13, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 13, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 13, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 13, 2016RFTPREMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS—
Feb 10, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 26, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 23, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance