USPTO serial 86794529
ÔRA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WHEATLEY, TRAVIS DWIGHT
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ÔRA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Holly Pekowsky
THOMAS L HOLT PERKINS COIE LLP131 SOUTH DEARBORN STCHICAGO, IL 60603UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | hardware, software platform and mobile application for communication among a smart home/smart building system and external service providers | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | Application service provider featuring application programming interface (API) software for environmental monitoring, control, and automation, and managing IoT (Internet of Things) endpoint devices; computer services, namely, expanding a socially connected lifestyle by providing a website featuring technology that enables users to link personal home activities with mobile devices; monitoring of smart home/smart building systems, namely, systems for the control and management of the environment within the home, office and buildings | ABANDONED | — |
| 045 | Monitoring of security systems for protection of property and individuals | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Panasonic Corporation of North America
- Other trademarks owned by Panasonic Corporation of North America
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Other trademarks in Class 045
- Similar marks named ÔRA
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 15, 2017 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 15, 2017 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 15, 2017 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 15, 2017 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 16, 2016 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 11, 2016 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 19, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 29, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2016 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 9, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 9, 2016 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 9, 2016 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2016 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2016 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 3, 2016 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 26, 2016 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Apr 14, 2016 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 11, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 7, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 22, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 22, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 11, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 29, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 12, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 12, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 12, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 4, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 27, 2015 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 26, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 24, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |