USPTO serial 86796499
VERO ENERGY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DAWE III, WILLIAM H
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with VERO ENERGY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Westport, CT
Westport, CT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
XAVIER MORALES
XAVIER MORALES LAW OFFICE OF XAVIER MORALESPO BOX 6510SAN ANTONIO, TX 78209-0510UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Consulting and advisory services in the fields of energy procurement, energy rates and options for procurement of electricity and natural gas supply; Energy usage management information services; Procurement services, namely, purchasing electricity and natural gas for others; Procurement services, namely, procurement and renewal of contracts for others for the purchase of energy; Energy management services, namely, providing a service that allows customers to purchase electricity at market rates; Providing purchasing information in the field of energy, electricity, and natural gas markets; Procurement of energy, namely, purchasing energy for others; Providing information about the use of energy, namely, information in the fields of energy efficiency; Providing energy management services for others, namely, providing advice regarding energy efficiency; Providing consumer information regarding energy rate options; Business management and consultation services in the fields of energy, energy services, and electrical utilities; Providing energy usage management and information; Business consulting and advisory services in the field of energy efficiency; Business consulting services in the fields of energy measurement to improve energy efficiency within residential, commercial, industrial and institutional facilities; Consultation in the field of energy efficiency; Consulting services in the field of energy efficiency for commercial and institutional facilities; Consulting services in the field of energy usage management and energy efficiency; Consulting services in the fields of energy consumption and usage conservation to improve energy efficiency; Information in the field of energy efficiency; Providing consumer information in the field of energy efficiency solutions and saving on energy costs; Providing consumer information in the field of selection of energy generating products, energy efficiency products, and renewable energy products; Providing consumer product information for the purpose of selecting energy generating and energy efficiency products to meet the consumer's specifications; Providing recommendations of service providers to consumers for commercial purposes; Provision of information, advice and consultancy in relation to energy efficiency | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 16, 2017 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 16, 2017 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 16, 2017 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 16, 2017 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 25, 2016 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 26, 2016 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 27, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 7, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 16, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 16, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 16, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 16, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 16, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 16, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 12, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 27, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 26, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |