USPTO serial 86797182
DECIPHER+IQ
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BRACEY, KAREN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DECIPHER+IQ?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Micheline Kelly Johnson
MICHELINE KELLY JOHNSON BAKER, DONELSON, BEARMAN, CALDWELL & BERKOWITZ, PC633 CHESTNUT STREET, SUITE 1900CHATTANOOGA, TN 37450UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable software and mobile application for monitoring financial transactions, namely, electronic funds transfer, ACH, credit card, debit card, electronic check and electronic payments in order to detect and prevent fraud, money laundering and prohibited financial transfers | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | Providing financial risk management services for analysis of financial transactions with respect to fraud, money laundering and prohibited transfers via a global computer network | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Providing a secured-access website featuring technology that allows users to monitor financial transactions, namely, electronic funds transfer, ACH, credit card, debit card, electronic check and electronic payments in order to detect and prevent fraud, money laundering and prohibited financial transfers | ACTIVE | — |
| 045 | Computerized security services, namely, monitoring electronic funds transfers, credit card and debit card and electronic check transactions via a global computer network to detect fraud, money laundering and prohibited transfers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Electronic Funds Source LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Electronic Funds Source LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Other trademarks in Class 045
- Similar marks named DECIPHER+IQ
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 25, 2017 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 25, 2017 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 21, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 19, 2017 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 19, 2017 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 19, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 23, 2016 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 27, 2016 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jun 28, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 28, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 8, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 25, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 24, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 24, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 24, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 19, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 19, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 19, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 16, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 28, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 27, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |