Drawing for VM

USPTO serial 86797885

VM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CARROLL, DORITT
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with VM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lawrence E. Abelman

LAWRENCE E. ABELMAN ABELMAN FRAYNE & SCHWAB666 3RD AVE FL 10NEW YORK, NY 10017-4046UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Downloadable software in the nature of a mobile application in the field of vehicles for use by automobile dealers for product merchandising, namely, management of automobile inventoryACTIVE—
042Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software and mobile application software for product merchandising, namely, management of automobile inventory in the field of vehicles for use by automobile dealersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 8, 2019MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 7, 2019MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 7, 2019ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 19, 2018GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 19, 2018GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 19, 2018CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Mar 16, 2018GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 16, 2018GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 16, 2018CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Mar 16, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 16, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 13, 2018ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Oct 3, 2017GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 3, 2017GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 3, 2017CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Sep 22, 2017RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Mar 17, 2017GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 17, 2017GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 17, 2017CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Mar 8, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 8, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 1, 2017ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Sep 19, 2016GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 19, 2016GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 19, 2016CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Aug 29, 2016RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Aug 28, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 16, 2016GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 16, 2016GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 16, 2016CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Feb 16, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 28, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 27, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance