USPTO serial 86799225
MACHINE LEARNING AS A SERVICE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 1, 2020
- Examiner
- SMITH, BRIDGETT G
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with MACHINE LEARNING AS A SERVICE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*
Plus Government fees of $325
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jorie L. Stroup
Jorie L. Stroup ROBERTS CALDERON SAFRAN & COLE P.C.7918 JONES BRANCH DRIVESUITE 500MCLEAN, VA, 22102Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Providing software as a service (SaaS) for enabling others to access and use machine learning algorithms and processes software in the fields of automated manufacturing, pathogen detection, medical diagnosis, bio-security and molecular medicine; providing software as a service (SaaS) for enabling others to upload and manage data for the training of data models by machine learning processes in the fields of automated manufacturing, pathogen detection, medical diagnosis, bio-security and molecular medicine; providing software as a service (SaaS) for enabling others to upload and manage data for determining and predicting patterns in the data in the fields of automated manufacturing, pathogen detection, medical diagnosis, bio-security and molecular medicine; Providing software as a service (SaaS) for enabling others to access and use data verification software in the fields of automated manufacturing, pathogen detection, medical diagnosis, bio-security and molecular medicine; providing software as a service (SaaS) for enabling others to access and use vision system in the fields of automated manufacturing, pathogen detection, medical diagnosis, bio-security and molecular medicine; providing software as a service (SaaS) for enabling others to access and use surface inspection software in the fields of automated manufacturing; providing software as a service (SaaS) for enabling others to access and use nano-scale vision system software in the fields of pathogen detection, medical diagnosis, bio-security and molecular medicine; providing software as a service (SaaS) for enabling others to access software in the fields of automated manufacturing, physical component defect analysis, detection of pathogens and toxins in a biological sample, medical diagnostics, bio-security, molecular medicine, energy, precision agriculture, defense, and automated trading systems | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 1, 2025 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2020 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Oct 28, 2020 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 21, 2020 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 8, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 8, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 6, 2020 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 13, 2020 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2020 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2020 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 11, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 11, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 11, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 3, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 3, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 3, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 21, 2018 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 26, 2018 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2018 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2018 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 26, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 22, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 22, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 26, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 26, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 26, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 26, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 26, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 26, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 17, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 29, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 29, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |