Drawing for XEDO

USPTO serial 86800665

XEDO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ROACH, APRIL K
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with XEDO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Matthew A. Williams

MATTHEW A. WILLIAMS WYATT, TARRANT & COMBS, LLP500 WEST JEFFERSON STREETSUITE 2800LOUISVILLE, KY 40202

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software for matching, evaluating and ordering clothing items; software for use in the clothing, footwear, headgear and menswear hire, rental and wholesale industries, namely, for tracking inventory and fulfilling consumer requests for specific items of clothingACTIVE—
025Articles of clothing, namely, suits, jackets, shirts, ties, trousers, tuxedos, scarves, cumberbunds, pocket squares and coats; footwear; headgear, namely, hats and capsACTIVE—
035Retail store services, online retail store services, wholesale store services all featuring articles of clothing, footwear, headgear and menswear; marketing services; advertising services; provision of information to customers, namely, consumer product information for the selection of goodsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 6, 2018MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 6, 2018ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 9, 2018NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
Jan 9, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 8, 2018EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 8, 2018DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jan 2, 2018AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Dec 19, 2017EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 19, 2017DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Dec 19, 2017ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Dec 19, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 4, 2017NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 9, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 9, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 19, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Apr 1, 2017PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 29, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 29, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 29, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 28, 2017ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Jan 11, 2017ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Oct 27, 2016GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 27, 2016GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 27, 2016CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Oct 26, 2016RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Oct 26, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 20, 2016GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 20, 2016GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 20, 2016CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Apr 15, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 15, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 15, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 18, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 18, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 18, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 18, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 2, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 30, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance