Drawing for RENAISSANCE

USPTO serial 86801997

RENAISSANCE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RICHARDS, SUSAN
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RENAISSANCE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David R. Posteraro, Jennifer M. Hart

DAVID R POSTERARO & JENNIFER M HART KOHRMAN JACKSON & KRANTZ LLP1375 E NINTH ST 29TH FLOORCLEVELAND, OH 44114UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
043Providing assisted living facilitiesACTIVEMay 17, 1985
044Nursing homesACTIVEMay 17, 1985

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 1, 2019MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Mar 6, 2019ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Mar 6, 2019EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Dec 21, 2018EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Jun 28, 2018GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 28, 2018GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 28, 2018CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Apr 29, 2018JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Feb 22, 2018EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Feb 22, 2018EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Aug 23, 2017GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Aug 23, 2017GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 23, 2017CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 3, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 2, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 2, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 25, 2017CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Apr 25, 2017COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Feb 2, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 2, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 2, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 24, 2017RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jan 23, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 11, 2016GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 11, 2016GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 11, 2016CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jun 17, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 16, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 16, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 17, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 17, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 17, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 17, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 2, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 31, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance