USPTO serial 86802185
ARROW CATTLEQUIP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 16, 2018
- Examiner
- KUNG, KAELIE ELIZABETH
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 705 means a Madrid-based U.S. registration has accepted Section 71 maintenance and Section 15 incontestability. The U.S. extension is active with strengthened rights. Track next renewal deadlines in TSDR and WIPO records.
Need help with ARROW CATTLEQUIP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Woodlands, Manitoba, CA
Woodlands, Manitoba, CA
Woodlands, Manitoba, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Daniel A. Rosenberg
Daniel A. Rosenberg Taft, Stettinous & Hollister2200 IDS CENTER, 80 S. 8TH ST.MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Livestock handling equipment, namely, livestock crushes in the nature of metal cages for storing livestock, metal squeeze chutes for moving livestock not being parts of machines, metal head gates and components therefor for the aforesaid goods, namely, head bails, rump bars, anti-kick bars, neck lugs and latch devices; metal loading rails for use in fencing for containing livestock; metal fencing panels for corrals for containing livestock; cradles for livestock, namely, metal cages for restraining livestock; livestock corrals and corral systems comprised of metal fence panels and metal bars; metal livestock fence panels, metal loading ramps, metal loading chutes for moving livestock not being parts of machines, milking bails in the nature of metal cages for restraining livestock for milking; metal walkways for livestock handling, namely, livestock alleys for moving livestock; metal fencing panels and components therefor, namely, metal latches, all being for livestock enclosures; metal tubes, rods and bars, all being components of livestock enclosures in the nature of metal cages; and metal construction elements being for fencing of livestock enclosures, namely, steel tubes and steel sheets | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | [ Design and development of livestock handling equipment systems, namely, livestock crushes, squeeze chutes, head gates and components therefor, namely, head bails, rump bars, anti-kick bars, neck lugs and latch devices ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by NORTHQUIP INC.
- Other trademarks owned by NORTHQUIP INC.
- Other trademarks owned by NORTHQUIP INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named ARROW CATTLEQUIP
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 1, 2025 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2025 | C15P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Apr 16, 2025 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 3, 2024 | PR23 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15 | — |
| Aug 3, 2024 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 18, 2024 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 16, 2023 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2018 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 31, 2018 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2018 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 11, 2018 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2018 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 25, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 25, 2018 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 15, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 15, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 11, 2018 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| May 30, 2018 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| May 30, 2018 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| May 17, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 17, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 17, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 5, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 20, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 20, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 20, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 30, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 30, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 25, 2017 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 16, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 16, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 16, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 16, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 16, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 12, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 20, 2017 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 3, 2016 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2016 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2016 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 3, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 3, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 3, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 13, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 13, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 13, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 29, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 29, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 29, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 19, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 3, 2015 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |