USPTO serial 86803229
NUTIBLES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CLAYTON, CHERYL A
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NUTIBLES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Chips primarily of potato and including corn, potato based snack foods; potato-based snack foods, namely, potato chips, potato puffs, potato sticks and potato fries | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Tortilla chips, taco chips, rice based snack foods; wheat based chips; wheat based snack foods; various combination grain based snack foods, namely, multigrain chips, multigrain puffs; pretzels; crackers and mixes consisting primarily of pretzels and crackers; popped popcorn; wheat chips; flour based snacks, namely, crackers; extruded snacks made of wheat, rice, multigrain; chips primarily of corn and including potato | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by The Trustee of the Levin Family 2010 Irrevocable Gift Trust, Barry C. Levin, Trustee
- Other trademarks owned by The Trustee of the Levin Family 2010 Irrevocable Gift Trust, Barry C. Levin, Trustee
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named NUTIBLES
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 20, 2018 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 20, 2018 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 1, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2018 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2018 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 31, 2018 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 29, 2018 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 18, 2018 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 18, 2018 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2018 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 18, 2018 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 17, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2017 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 15, 2017 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 3, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 30, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 30, 2016 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 30, 2016 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 30, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 19, 2016 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 24, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 24, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 4, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 18, 2016 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 18, 2016 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2016 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2016 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 11, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 10, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 10, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 20, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 20, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 20, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 6, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 3, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 2, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |