Drawing for KAIYA BEACH RESORT

USPTO serial 86803920

KAIYA BEACH RESORT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FRYE, KIMBERLY
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with KAIYA BEACH RESORT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Farrar J. Barker

FARRAR J. BARKER Barker Williams, PLLC60 Clayton LaneSuite BSanta Rosa Beach, FL 32459

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Retail store services featuring a wide variety of consumer goods of othersACTIVE—
036Leasing of real property; Real estate management servicesACTIVE—
043Hotel services; Rental of beach chairs, towels and umbrellas for recreational use; Resort hotel services; Resort lodging servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 13, 2020MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 13, 2020ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 14, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 13, 2019EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Jun 11, 2019EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Jun 11, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 4, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 30, 2018EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Nov 30, 2018EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Nov 30, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 20, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 20, 2018NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
Jun 19, 2018EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jun 19, 2018DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jun 12, 2018AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jun 5, 2018EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jun 5, 2018DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Jun 5, 2018ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Jun 5, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 16, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 14, 2017EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Nov 14, 2017EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Nov 14, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 14, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 12, 2017EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 12, 2017EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 12, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 25, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 13, 2016NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 18, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 18, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 28, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Sep 9, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 16, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 16, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 16, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 16, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 1, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 1, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 1, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 22, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 4, 2015MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Nov 3, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 2, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance