USPTO serial 86804398
DEFENDTEX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 4, 2022
- Examiner
- FARRELL, ANNE M
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with DEFENDTEX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $1,795*
Plus Government fees of $1,625
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Moorabbin, VIC 3189, AU
Moorabbin, VIC 3189, AU
Dandenong South, AU
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David R. Schaffer
David R. Schaffer MILES & STOCKBRIDGE P.C.1751 Pinnancle Drive, Suite 1500Tysons Corner, VA 22102UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electronic remote control apparatus for the guidance of weapons; wireless controllers to remotely control weapons; electronic weapons control installations; weapons simulators for use in weapons training; electric and electronic security installations, namely, closed circuit video cameras and video monitors and audible and visual alarms; electric and electronic video security surveillance installations; optical apparatus, namely, optical character recognition apparatus for use in guiding weapons; protective padded clothing and helmets, hard plate personal body armor for protection against bodily harm and blunt force trauma; bullet-proof personal protection shields for protecting against ballistic threat; Industrial automation controls for use in the automation of industrial robots, and robotic weapons platforms | ACTIVE | — |
| 012 | Unmanned aerial Vehicles (UAVs), not designed for carrying passengers | ACTIVE | — |
| 013 | Magazines for weapons; apparatus for launching weapons, namely, rocket launchers; guns; guided weapons, namely, guided missiles; guided projectiles; propellant substance weapons, namely, sprays for personal defense purposes; ballistic weapons | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Weapons research; research relating to armed weapons security; research, engineering and Technical consultancy for the law enforcement and military industries in the field of product safety testing of ballistic weapons; materials research relating to weapons and security; research, development and design in the field of missile defense; Technological consulting services relating to the commercial evaluation and rating of ballistic weapons for the law enforcement and military industries prior to purchase; research and design services relating to weapons and weapons systems; testing and quality evaluation of weapons and weapons systems; design of weapons | ACTIVE | — |
| 045 | Intellectual property consultation, namely, intellectual property searching and intellectual property research; licensing of research and development in the form of patents | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by DefendTex Pty Ltd
- Other trademarks owned by DefendTex Pty Ltd
- Other trademarks owned by DefendTex Pty Ltd
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Other trademarks in Class 013
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Other trademarks in Class 045
- Similar marks named DEFENDTEX
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 12, 2023 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 12, 2023 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jul 12, 2023 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 4, 2022 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 2, 2021 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Sep 3, 2021 | CRTP | REG. CANCELLED - RESTORED TO PENDENCY | — |
| Aug 23, 2021 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 23, 2021 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 10, 2021 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Aug 2, 2021 | RCII | REQUEST TO CANCEL INADVERTENTLY ISSUED REGISTRATION RECEIVED | — |
| May 18, 2021 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 13, 2021 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Apr 13, 2021 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 13, 2021 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 17, 2020 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Dec 17, 2020 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 17, 2020 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Dec 17, 2020 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 17, 2020 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 17, 2020 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 7, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 17, 2019 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 17, 2019 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 31, 2019 | CHPB | POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| May 31, 2019 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Jan 16, 2019 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 18, 2018 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2018 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 28, 2018 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 17, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 17, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 17, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 5, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 5, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 5, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 5, 2018 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 28, 2018 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Aug 16, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 30, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 30, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 30, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 2, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 2, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 2, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 11, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 11, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 9, 2018 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 29, 2017 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 29, 2017 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 29, 2017 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 6, 2017 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 26, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 26, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 26, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 2, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 2, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 30, 2017 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 17, 2016 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2016 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2016 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 26, 2016 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 25, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 18, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 8, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 8, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 8, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 25, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 25, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 25, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 23, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 5, 2015 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 3, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |