Drawing for ICE DISTRICT

USPTO serial 86804689

ICE DISTRICT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BURKE, JUSTINE N
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ICE DISTRICT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lisa D. Statt Foy

Lisa D. Statt Foy Field LLP400 - 444 7 Avenue SWCalgary, AB, T2P0X8CANADA

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Sunglasses and sunglass cases; bicycle helmets; hockey helmets; Downloadable software in the nature of a mobile application for accessing information in the area of entertainment and sports programming, scheduling, information and newsACTIVE—
024Handkerchiefs; towels for babies; promotional souvenirs, namely, felt pennantsACTIVE—
025Clothing and wearing apparel, namely, t-shirts, aprons, cloth bibs, sweatshirts, tank tops, scarves, neckties, fashion bow ties, belts, uniforms, dress and casual shirts, sweaters, coveralls, suspenders, warm-up and jogging suits, sport shirts, turtlenecks, knit shirts, woven shirts, jackets and parkas, tops, blouses, polo shirts, golf shirts, coats, pajamas and bathrobes; and headwear, namely, hats, baseball caps, sun-visors, toques, bonnets, headbands and wristbands, berets, and straw hats; baby clothing, namely, dresses that may also be used as towels, and cloth bibs for babies; gloves, mittens, socks; footwear for men, women and children, namely, shoes, socks, sneakers, boots, sandalsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 16, 2019MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 16, 2019ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 12, 2019ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 12, 2019REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 13, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 11, 2019EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Feb 11, 2019EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Feb 11, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 14, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 10, 2018TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 10, 2018EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 10, 2018EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 10, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 13, 2018NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 19, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Dec 19, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 29, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Nov 15, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 14, 2017XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Nov 14, 2017GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 14, 2017GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 14, 2017CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Oct 27, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 27, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 25, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 13, 2017ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Apr 14, 2017GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Apr 14, 2017GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 14, 2017CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 22, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 21, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 21, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 23, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 23, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 23, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 27, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 26, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 26, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 26, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 26, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 26, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 23, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 5, 2015MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Nov 4, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 3, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance