USPTO serial 86804772
TIRE ENGINE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KUNG, KAELIE ELIZABETH
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TIRE ENGINE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Red Deer, Alberta, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Nathan Woodruff
NATHAN WOODRUFF THOMPSON WOODRUFF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW200 - 10328 81 AVENUE NWEDMONTON, ALBERTA, T6E1X2CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for mobile devices and computers, namely, business management software for the tire industry, including tools for managing a retail store featuring tires, accessing and searching tire databases integrated with suppliers, and managing a vehicle service shop featuring tires | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Providing a website featuring non-downloadable software for mobile devices and computers, namely, business management software for the tire industry, including tools for managing a retail store featuring tires, accessing and searching tire databases integrated with suppliers, and managing a vehicle service shop featuring tires | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 29, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 29, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 13, 2018 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2018 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2018 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 9, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 13, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 13, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 13, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 8, 2018 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 13, 2017 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2017 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2017 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 13, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 9, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 9, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 8, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 6, 2017 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 29, 2016 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2016 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2016 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 29, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 28, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 28, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 24, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 10, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 26, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 26, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 26, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 23, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 4, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 3, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |