Drawing for BEACHOLOGIST

USPTO serial 86805000

BEACHOLOGIST

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SANDER, DREW M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BEACHOLOGIST?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Joseph V. Norvell

Joseph V. Norvell Norvell IP llcP.O. Box 2461Chicago, IL 60690UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
039Booking of seats for travel; Booking of travel tickets; Coordinating travel arrangements for individuals and for groups; On-line transportation reservation and travel ticket reservation services; Providing a website featuring information on travel; Providing information, news and commentary in the field of travel; Travel agency services, namely, making reservations and bookings for cruises; Travel agency services, namely, making reservations and bookings for transportation; Travel booking agencies; Travel information servicesACTIVE—
043Providing a website featuring information in the field of hotels and temporary accommodations for travelers; Providing information and advice on hotels and restaurants to tourists and business travelers; Providing personalized information about hotels and temporary accommodations for travel via the Internet; Travel agency services, namely, making reservations and booking for temporary lodging; Travel agency services, namely, making reservations and bookings for restaurants and mealsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 28, 2019MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 28, 2019ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 7, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 6, 2019EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
May 3, 2019IROARESPONSE TO ITU OFFICE ACTION ENTERED—
May 3, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 11, 2019INCEITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR EXTENSION REQUEST—
Mar 27, 2019EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Mar 27, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 22, 2019ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 22, 2019REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 20, 2019ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Feb 8, 2019CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Feb 8, 2019AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jan 7, 2019EWAFTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS—
Sep 28, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 26, 2018EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Sep 26, 2018EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Sep 26, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 14, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 12, 2018EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Mar 12, 2018EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Mar 12, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 28, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 26, 2017EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Sep 26, 2017EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Sep 26, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 11, 2017ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 11, 2017REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 5, 2017ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Mar 29, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 27, 2017EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 27, 2017EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 27, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 27, 2016NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 12, 2016ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Apr 7, 2016ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Mar 29, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 29, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 9, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Feb 24, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 23, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 4, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 3, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance