Drawing for BLENDER

USPTO serial 86805477

BLENDER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
VLCEK, TOMAS V
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BLENDER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Glen L. Nuttall

Glen L. Nuttall KLEIN, O'NEILL & SINGH, LLP30 Corporate Park, Suite 211Irvine, CA 92606UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
034Portable electric oral vaporizers that simultaneously vaporize a wax medium and a liquid medium for smoking purposes; Reusable portable electric oral vaporizers that enable users to load multiple types of vaporizing media for smoking purposesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 30, 2021MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 30, 2021ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 26, 2021EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 25, 2021EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Mar 24, 2021AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Feb 2, 2021NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Feb 2, 2021TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Feb 2, 2021DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 2, 2021PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Feb 2, 2021PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Feb 1, 2021EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Aug 21, 2020CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Aug 21, 2020TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 21, 2020ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 21, 2020REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 21, 2020COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Aug 1, 2020EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 30, 2020EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jul 30, 2020EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jul 30, 2020EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 1, 2020DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 1, 2020EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 30, 2020EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 30, 2020EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 30, 2020EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 30, 2019NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 4, 2019NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jun 4, 2019PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 15, 2019NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
May 1, 2019PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 29, 2019EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Apr 29, 2019CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 9, 2019JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Oct 11, 2017GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 11, 2017GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 11, 2017CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Aug 15, 2017JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jun 13, 2017GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jun 13, 2017GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jun 13, 2017CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Apr 18, 2017NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Apr 18, 2017PGTTPETITION GRANTED - TTAB APPEAL FILED—
Apr 18, 2017EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Apr 18, 2017JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Apr 18, 2017EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Apr 5, 2017APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Mar 28, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 28, 2017PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Sep 26, 2016GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Sep 26, 2016GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 26, 2016CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 2, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 2, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 2, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 26, 2016NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Aug 26, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 26, 2016PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Aug 26, 2016PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Feb 24, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 24, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 24, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 22, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 4, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 3, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance