USPTO serial 86806631
GLD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MAZZELLA, BRANDY BARRETT
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 121 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GLD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Grand Cayman, KY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
N. Christopher Norton
N. CHRISTOPHER NORTON ARENT FOX LLP1717 K ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20006-5344UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computers; computer peripherals devices; apparatus for the processing of digital information; electrical digital control apparatus; secure digital cards; computer operated control apparatus; computer programs, recorded; computer programs for use in database management; computer programs for the analysis of data processing efficiency, performance or procedure; computer software; computer hardware; application software; communication software; application development software; computer software applications, downloadable; printed publications in electronically readable form; data processing apparatus, installations and devices; data processing programmes and software; electronic data communications apparatus and installations; data processing equipment; mobile application software; communications networks; computer networks; network servers; telecommunications networks | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Technological services and research and design relating thereto; computer software design; configuration of computer software; research, development, design and upgrading of computer software; software creation; computer security services, namely, design and development of secure computer hardware, software and systems; digital signature verification services; electronic cryptology services; installation, maintenance and repair of computer software; computer programming; advisory services in the field of product development and quality improvement of software; diagnosis of faults in computer software; integration of computer hardware and software systems; design of interior decoration, building interiors, business premises, buildings and furnishings; design services; designing and planning of real estate subdivisions and developments; real estate planning; information, advisory and consultancy services relating to the aforesaid services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 4, 2016 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 4, 2016 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 2, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 2, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 2, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 24, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 15, 2015 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Dec 4, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 16, 2015 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 5, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 5, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |