USPTO serial 86807320
MONEY AVATAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GARTNER, JOHN M
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MONEY AVATAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David P. Cooper
David P. Cooper KOLISCH HARTWELL, P.C.520 S.W. YAMHILL ST., SUITE 300PORTLAND, OR 97204UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Accounting services; bookkeeping; classified advertising services; archiving of financial records; business formation and organization consulting; business consulting in the field of finance; business strategy development services; business consulting, namely, business opportunity assessment; marketing services, namely, promotional services for the collectables of others; on-line business directories featuring financial advisors and financial services; tracking and monitoring, for businesses of others for cost accounting purposes, administrative matters, namely, employee activities, client activities and office activities, financial matters, namely, billing activities, office and employee expense activities, and human-resource matters, namely, employee performance, morale, compensation and benefits; matching consumers with professional financial advisors; online auctions and auctions of collectables | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8, 2021 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 8, 2021 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 22, 2021 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 21, 2021 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 2, 2021 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2021 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 6, 2020 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2020 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 2, 2020 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2020 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 4, 2020 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2020 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 2, 2020 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2020 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 11, 2020 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2020 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 8, 2020 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 7, 2020 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2020 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jan 6, 2020 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 6, 2020 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 4, 2019 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 4, 2019 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 2, 2019 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2019 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2019 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 2, 2019 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 2, 2019 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2019 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 2, 2018 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 7, 2018 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2018 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 18, 2018 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 3, 2018 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 2, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 11, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 10, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 10, 2018 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 10, 2018 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2018 | GNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2018 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 16, 2018 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 16, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 16, 2018 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 8, 2018 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jan 29, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 29, 2018 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 29, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 29, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 3, 2017 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 3, 2017 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 3, 2017 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 12, 2017 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 12, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 4, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 3, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 2, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 2, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 2, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 2, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 2, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 24, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 6, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |