Drawing for WE BUILD AMERICA

USPTO serial 86809668

WE BUILD AMERICA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BIBBINS, ODESSA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WE BUILD AMERICA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Alison D. Frey

Alison D. Frey Dickinson Wright, PLLC1825 Eye Street NW, Suite 900Washington, DC 20006UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Attachments and adaptors for power tools, namely, extenders for power tools and adapters for driving collated screws; bits for power drills, namely, core drilling bits; bits for power tools, namely, hammer drivers; blades for power saws; portable electric and gasoline powered air compressors used to power pneumatic tools for driving nails, screws and staples and brads; pneumatic and electric tools for blowing air and driving nails, screws, and staples, namely, construction staplers, brad nailers, finish nailers and staplers, roofing nailers and staplers, air hammers, and framing nailers and staplers; parts for compressed-air tools, namely, couplers, adaptors, hose fittings, clamping tools; air filters for mechanical purposes; power-operated lubricant dispensers for machines; regulators being parts of machines; blades for power saws; power-operated circular cutting and grinding wheelsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 22, 2018MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 22, 2018ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 14, 2017ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 14, 2017REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 28, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 26, 2017EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 26, 2017EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 26, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 20, 2016NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 25, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 25, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 5, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Sep 20, 2016PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 19, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 21, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 21, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 21, 2016ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Feb 29, 2016GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Feb 29, 2016GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 29, 2016CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 9, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 9, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 8, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 29, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 18, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 18, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 18, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 15, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 12, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 7, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance