USPTO serial 86810259
PETER MILLAR CROWN SPORT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HELLMAN, ELI J
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PETER MILLAR CROWN SPORT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert C. Van Arnam
Robert C. Van Arnam Williams Mullen, c/o IP Docketing8300 Greensboro Drive, Suite 1100Tysons, VA 22102UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | Goods made of leather and imitations of leather, namely, wallets, coin purses, handbags, tote bags, gym bags, sports bags, suitcases, travelling bags, business card cases, card wallets, credit card cases, leather credit card cases, key cases, backpacks, clutch bags, beach bags, shopping bags, briefcases, travelling trunks, travel baggage, garment bags for travel, duffel bags for travel, grooming organizers for travel, trunks, and vanity cases sold empty | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 22, 2018 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 22, 2018 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 8, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2018 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 6, 2018 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2018 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 6, 2018 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 19, 2017 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 31, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 25, 2017 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 5, 2017 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2017 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 21, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 31, 2017 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 24, 2017 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 10, 2017 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| May 10, 2017 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| May 10, 2017 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| May 10, 2017 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| May 10, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 10, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 4, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 4, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 3, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 3, 2017 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 4, 2016 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2016 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2016 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 27, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 4, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 4, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 4, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 4, 2016 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 4, 2016 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 4, 2016 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 4, 2016 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 28, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 28, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 27, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 30, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 1, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 1, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 1, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 29, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 18, 2015 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Dec 16, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 10, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 24, 2015 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Nov 11, 2015 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 10, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 9, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |