Drawing for TODAY I AM

USPTO serial 86811641

TODAY I AM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
LAMONT, MIAH ROSENBERG
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TODAY I AM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Christopher S. Beer

CHRISTOPHER S. BEER IRONMARK LAW GROUP, PLLC2311 N. 45TH STREET, SUITE 365SEATTLE, WA 98103UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Retail store services, mail order catalog services and online retail store services featuring clothingACTIVE
042Providing a website featuring technology that enables users to find information and advice on parenting and being a tween-age girl; providing a website featuring technology that enables users to communicate and share data with an online community of parents and tween-age girls in the field of information and advice on parenting and being a tween-age girlACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 16, 2018MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 15, 2018ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 14, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Jun 12, 2017EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Jun 12, 2017EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Jun 12, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 13, 2016NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 18, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Oct 18, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 28, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Sep 9, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Sep 6, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Sep 5, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 5, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 7, 2016GEANNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED
Mar 7, 2016GEAPEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED
Mar 7, 2016EPENCOMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION AUTOMATIC ENTRY
Mar 7, 2016CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED
Mar 1, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Nov 10, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Nov 10, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance