Drawing for CLINIQ

USPTO serial 86811688

CLINIQ

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SPRUILL, DARRYL M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CLINIQ?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert J. Duminiak

Robert J. Duminiak Duminiak Law, LLC411 Doylestown Road #445Montgomeryville, PA 18936UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Software as a service featuring software for maintaining electronic medical records for use in the medical field; software as a service featuring software for use in providing access to a customer's clinical patient data; software as a service featuring software for use in data mining; providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software and applications for the purpose of providing to medical care facilities or clinicians, namely, hospitals, clinics, and physicians, access to their consolidated medical data; software as a service featuring software for use in providing medical practice data, reports, and metrics based on clinical patient dataACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 30, 2019MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 30, 2019ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 5, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 4, 2019EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Jun 4, 2019AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
May 29, 2019EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
May 29, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 20, 2019ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 20, 2019REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 1, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 29, 2018EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Nov 29, 2018EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Nov 29, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 22, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 18, 2018EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
May 18, 2018EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
May 18, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 1, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 29, 2017EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Nov 29, 2017EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Nov 29, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 23, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 20, 2017EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 20, 2017EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 20, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 29, 2016NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 4, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 4, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 14, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Aug 24, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 24, 2016XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Aug 24, 2016GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 24, 2016GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 24, 2016CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Aug 12, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 11, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 11, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 12, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 12, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 12, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 5, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 11, 2015MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Nov 10, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 10, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance