Drawing for JADERALMEIDA

USPTO serial 86811740

JADERALMEIDA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CHHINA, KARANENDRA S
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with JADERALMEIDA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Vivian Ortiz Ponce

Vivian Ortiz Ponce Perez Guerrero LLCP.O. Box 9024163San Juan, PR 00902-4163UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035retail stores, online retail stores, and online ordering services featuring furnitureACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 5, 2017MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 4, 2017ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 6, 2017NOACCORRECTED NOA MAILED—
May 3, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
May 2, 2017EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 2, 2017DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Feb 15, 2017AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Feb 4, 2017EWAFTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS—
Feb 1, 2017EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 1, 2017DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Feb 1, 2017ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Feb 1, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 2, 2016NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 7, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 18, 2016NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 3, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 3, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 2, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 2, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 21, 2016ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 21, 2016REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 1, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 1, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 1, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 1, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 13, 2015MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Nov 12, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 10, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance