USPTO serial 86814834
INTERFOCUS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SABLE, ERIC
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with INTERFOCUS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Miriam D. Trudell
MIRIAM D TRUDELL SHERIDAN ROSS PC1560 BROADWAYSUITE 1200DENVER, CO 80202Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | SOFTWARE FOR COMPUTER SECURITY, IT SECURITY, INFORMATION SECURITY, DATA SECURITY, NETWORK SECURITY; SOFTWARE FOR PROTECTING PERSONAL AND BUSINESS INFORMATION; SOFTWARE FOR USE IN CONNECTION WITH IT ASSET MANAGEMENT, HARDWARE MANAGEMENT, NETWORK MANAGEMENT AND COMPUTER MANAGEMENT; SOFTWARE FOR ADMINISTRATION OF NETWORKS; SOFTWARE FOR MONITORING IT PERFORMANCE, NETWORK PERFORMANCE AND COMPUTER PERFORMANCE; SOFTWARE FOR USE WITH PRODUCTIVITY MANAGEMENT AND EMPLOYEE MONITORING AND MANAGEMENT; SOFTWARE TO PREVENT LEAKAGE OF INFORMATION AND DATA; SOFTWARE FOR MONITORING OF OPERATION LOGS; SOFTWARE FOR WEB ACCESS MANAGEMENT; SOFTWARE FOR HARDWARE CONTROL | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | SOFTWARE AS A SERVICE (SAAS) SERVICES FEATURING SOFTWARE FOR COMPUTER SECURITY, IT SECURITY, INFORMATION SECURITY, DATA SECURITY, NETWORK SECURITY; SOFTWARE AS A SERVICE (SAAS) SERVICES FEATURING SOFTWARE FOR PROTECTING PERSONAL AND BUSINESS INFORMATION; SOFTWARE AS A SERVICE (SAAS) SERVICES FEATURING SOFTWARE FOR USE IN CONNECTION WITH IT ASSET MANAGEMENT, HARDWARE MANAGEMENT, NETWORK MANAGEMENT AND COMPUTER MANAGEMENT; SOFTWARE AS A SERVICE (SAAS) SERVICES FEATURING SOFTWARE FOR ADMINISTRATION OF NETWORKS; SOFTWARE AS A SERVICE (SAAS) SERVICES FEATURING SOFTWARE FOR MONITORING IT PERFORMANCE, NETWORK PERFORMANCE AND COMPUTER PERFORMANCE; SOFTWARE AS A SERVICE (SAAS) SERVICES FEATURING SOFTWARE FOR USE WITH PRODUCTIVITY MANAGEMENT AND EMPLOYEE MONITORING AND MANAGEMENT; SOFTWARE AS A SERVICE (SAAS) SERVICES FEATURING SOFTWARE FOR PREVENTING LEAKAGE OF INFORMATION AND DATA; SOFTWARE AS A SERVICE (SAAS) SERVICES FEATURING SOFTWARE FOR MONITORING OF OPERATION LOGS; SOFTWARE AS A SERVICE (SAAS) SERVICES FEATURING SOFTWARE FOR WEB ACCESS MANAGEMENT; SOFTWARE AS A SERVICE (SAAS) SERVICES FEATURING SOFTWARE FOR HARDWARE CONTROL | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 10, 2017 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 10, 2017 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 10, 2017 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 10, 2017 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 28, 2016 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 1, 2016 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 3, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 3, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 13, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2016 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 30, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 14, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 11, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 10, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 10, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 5, 2016 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Mar 5, 2016 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Mar 5, 2016 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Mar 3, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 14, 2015 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 13, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |