Drawing for LICENSED BY CORE KNOWLEDGE

USPTO serial 86815001

LICENSED BY CORE KNOWLEDGE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
RHIM, ANDREW
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LICENSED BY CORE KNOWLEDGE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

James R. Creekmore

James R. Creekmore The Creekmore Law Firm318 N. Main StreetBlacksburg, VA 24060UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Educational publications, namely, educational learning cards, flash cards, activity cards, workbooks, textbooks, activity books, story books, puzzle books, printed puzzles, teacher guides, manuals, posters and educational booklets in the field of implementation of a proprietary curriculum framework in elementary and middle school classroomsACTIVE
041Educational services, namely, conducting classes, seminars, conferences, workshops, retreats, camps and field trips in the field of elementary and middle school education and distribution of training material in connection therewithACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 30, 2017MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 30, 2017ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 7, 2016ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 7, 2016REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Jun 28, 2016NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 3, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
May 3, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 13, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Mar 28, 2016PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Mar 23, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Mar 7, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Mar 7, 2016XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Mar 7, 2016GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Mar 7, 2016GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Mar 7, 2016CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Mar 4, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 4, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 4, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 3, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Nov 14, 2015MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED
Nov 13, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Nov 13, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance