Drawing for ENES KANTER LIGHT FOUNDATION

USPTO serial 86815661

ENES KANTER LIGHT FOUNDATION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
OH, WON TEAK
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ENES KANTER LIGHT FOUNDATION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Thomas P. White

THOMAS P. WHITE SCHIFF HARDIN LLPP.O. BOX 06079CHICAGO, IL 60606UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036Charitable foundation services, namely, providing fundraising activities, funding, scholarships, financial awards, and/or financial assistance for programs and services in the fields of education, health, wellness, economic development, and poverty alleviationACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 30, 2017MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 30, 2017ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 29, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 27, 2017EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 27, 2017EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 27, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 13, 2017CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Mar 13, 2017COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Sep 27, 2016NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 2, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Aug 2, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 13, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jun 24, 2016PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 17, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 27, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 26, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 26, 2016ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
May 4, 2016GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
May 4, 2016GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 4, 2016CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 13, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 13, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 6, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 24, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 11, 2016GEANNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Jan 11, 2016GEAPEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Jan 11, 2016EPENCOMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION AUTOMATIC ENTRY—
Jan 11, 2016CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED—
Jan 4, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 14, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 13, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance