USPTO serial 86816283
HUMAN-CENTERED INNOVATIONS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 1, 2016
- Examiner
- REINHART, MEGHAN M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with HUMAN-CENTERED INNOVATIONS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $748*
Plus Government fees of $1,300
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John J. Brooks III
12 GILL STREETSUITE 1400WOBURN, MA 01801Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Business management and consultation in the field of human factors engineering; Business management and consultation in the field of applying cognitive science techniques for business purposes; Business management and consultation in the fields of modeling, simulation, computer-based training, performance measurement, performance assessment, performance feedback, data capture, cognitive computing, cognitive modeling, human-machine interaction, data extraction or human language translation; Business management and consultation in the field of intelligence and security technology; Compiling and analyzing statistics, data and other sources of information for business purposes | ACTIVE | Aug 24, 2016 |
| 042 | Scientific research and development; Scientific research, development and consulting services in the fields of: physical and life sciences, engineering, management, cognitive sciences, social sciences and computer sciences; Product research and development; Computer software design and development; Design and development of multimedia products; Scientific research, development and consultation related thereto in the fields of modeling, simulation, computer-based training, performance measurement, performance assessment, performance feedback, data capture, cognitive computing, cognitive modeling, human-machine interaction, data extraction or human language translation; Medical and scientific research in the fields of modeling, simulation, computer-based training, performance measurement, performance assessment, performance feedback, data capture, cognitive computing, cognitive modeling, human-machine interaction, data extraction or human language translation; Engineering services in the fields of modeling, simulation, computer-based training, performance measurement, performance assessment, performance feedback, data capture, cognitive computing, cognitive modeling, human-machine interaction, data extraction or human language translation; Scientific research in the field of intelligence and security; Engineering management and engineering consultation in the field of human factors engineering; Engineering management and engineering consultation in the field of applying cognitive science techniques for business purposes; Information technology consultation in the fields of modeling, simulation, computer-based training, performance measurement, performance assessment, performance feedback, data capture, cognitive computing, cognitive modeling, human-machine interaction, data extraction or human language translation; Information technology consultation in the field of intelligence and security technology | ACTIVE | Aug 24, 2016 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 1, 2025 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| May 26, 2022 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 26, 2022 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| May 26, 2022 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 15, 2021 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 1, 2021 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2016 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Sep 27, 2016 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2016 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 25, 2016 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 25, 2016 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 23, 2016 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 23, 2016 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 7, 2016 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 7, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 7, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 7, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 14, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 14, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 14, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 4, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 16, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 14, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |