Drawing for CRYOVAC FLEXPREP

USPTO serial 86818065

CRYOVAC FLEXPREP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MACFARLANE, JAMES W
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CRYOVAC FLEXPREP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jayne Conway Hunter

Todd M. Hess Hunter Law Firm, PLLC300 East Kingston AvenueSuite 200Charlotte, NC 28203

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Packaging machinery, namely, packaging machines; food packaging equipment, namely, packaging machines; structural parts for the aforesaid goodsACTIVE—
016Plastic materials for packaging, namely, plastic film for packaging, plastic bags for packaging, plastic sacks for packaging, and plastic pouches for packaging; flexible plastic wrapping materials, namely, plastic film for packaging, plastic bags for packaging, plastic sacks for packaging, and plastic pouches for packaging; plastic wrapping materials, namely, plastic film for packaging, plastic bags for packaging, plastic sacks for packaging, and plastic pouches for packaging; packaging materials in the form of films, bags, sacks or pouches, namely, plastic film for packaging, plastic bags for packaging, plastic sacks for packaging, and plastic pouches for packaging; pouches of plastic for wrappingACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 14, 2020MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 13, 2020ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 21, 2019ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jun 15, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 14, 2019EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Jun 5, 2019EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Jun 5, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 18, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 17, 2019EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Apr 17, 2019AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Mar 21, 2019NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Mar 21, 2019TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Mar 21, 2019PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Mar 21, 2019PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Mar 7, 2019EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Sep 11, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 7, 2018EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Sep 7, 2018EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Sep 7, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 9, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 7, 2018EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Mar 7, 2018EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Mar 7, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 7, 2018ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 7, 2018REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 7, 2018TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 9, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 7, 2017EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 7, 2017EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 7, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 7, 2017NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 10, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jan 10, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 21, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Dec 8, 2016PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 26, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 15, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 15, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 15, 2016ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Nov 3, 2016GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Nov 3, 2016GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 3, 2016CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 13, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 13, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 6, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 29, 2016NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Sep 29, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 29, 2016PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Sep 29, 2016PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Mar 12, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 12, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 12, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 5, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 18, 2015MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Nov 17, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 16, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance