USPTO serial 86819617
DRONE-TEK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FRIEDMAN, LESLEE ANN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 120 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DRONE-TEK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Pell City, AL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Andrei D. Tsygankov
ANDREI TSYGANKOV Bekiares Eliezer LLP2870 Peachtree Rd #512Atlanta, GA 30305UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer application software for mobile computing devices, namely, software for controlling and monitoring Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs); Computer hardware and software systems for use in unmanned vehicles; Computer software and firmware for use in unmanned vehicles, including aerial drones; Computer software and hardware for operating unmanned vehicles, including aerial drones; Computer software for managing and monitoring the operation of unmanned vehicles, including drones; Computer software platforms for inputting and managing operating parameters for unmanned vehicles, including Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs); Downloadable geographic information system (GIS) software; Downloadable mobile applications for controlling and monitoring unmanned vehicles, including aerial drones; Downloadable software for controlling unmanned vehicles; Downloadable software in the nature of a mobile application for controlling and monitoring drones; Remote controls for unmanned vehicles, including aerial drones; Software for inputting, uploading, storing, managing and downloading data and geographical information related to the operation of unmanned vehicles, including aerial drones; Wireless controllers to monitor and control the functioning of other electronic devices; Wireless controllers to remotely monitor and control the function and status of other electrical, electronic, and mechanical devices or systems, namely, Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) | ACTIVE | — |
| 012 | Aircraft; Drones; Electrically-powered aircraft; Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs); Utility terrain vehicles (UTVs); UTVs (utility terrain vehicles) | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 31, 2018 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 6, 2016 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 6, 2016 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 7, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 7, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 7, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 7, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 18, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 17, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |