Drawing for FIRST CLASS EXPERIENCE ON THE GO

USPTO serial 86820039

FIRST CLASS EXPERIENCE ON THE GO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
โ€”
Examiner
HAYES, GINA CLARK
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FIRST CLASS EXPERIENCE ON THE GO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Barry Oliver Chase

BARRY OLIVER CHASE CHASELAWYERS21 SE 1ST AVE., SUITE 700MIAMI, FL 33131UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
021Dental care kit comprising toothbrushes and floss; Oral care kit comprising toothbrushes and flossACTIVEโ€”

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited ยง2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 24, 2017MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 24, 2017ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 17, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILEDโ€”
Nov 17, 2016NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILEDโ€”
Nov 16, 2016EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTEDโ€”
Nov 16, 2016DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETEโ€”
Nov 9, 2016AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGALโ€”
Oct 19, 2016EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILEDโ€”
Oct 19, 2016DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVEDโ€”
Oct 19, 2016ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVEDโ€”
Oct 19, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 21, 2016NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline โ€” usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 26, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILEDโ€”
Apr 26, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 6, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILEDโ€”
Mar 24, 2016PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETEDโ€”
Mar 23, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIEโ€”
Mar 7, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTERโ€”
Mar 7, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 7, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 7, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 7, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 7, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 7, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 29, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINERโ€”
Nov 18, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTEREDโ€”
Nov 17, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTEREDโ€”

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance