USPTO serial 86820389
REALASSETS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RYDLAND, STEPHANIE DIANA
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with REALASSETS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Christian W. Liedtke
CHRISTIAN W. LIEDTKE ACUMINIS PC3420 BRISTOL ST.6TH FLOORCOSTA MESA, CA 92626Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Investment services, namely, investment acquisition, consultation, advisory and development | ACTIVE | Dec 1, 2016 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 30, 2020 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Jan 17, 2020 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2019 | ERTP | TEAS RESPONSE TO PETITION DEFICIENCY RECEIVED | — |
| May 8, 2019 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| May 7, 2019 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Mar 8, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 8, 2019 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 8, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 8, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 24, 2018 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| May 24, 2018 | GNSF | SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| May 24, 2018 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 26, 2018 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 26, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 26, 2018 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 20, 2018 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Mar 8, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 8, 2018 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 8, 2018 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 8, 2018 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 8, 2018 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 8, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 8, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 18, 2017 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| Sep 18, 2017 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 6, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 6, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 6, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 16, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 16, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 15, 2017 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| May 15, 2017 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 15, 2017 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 15, 2017 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 15, 2017 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 15, 2017 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 13, 2017 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 15, 2016 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2016 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 15, 2016 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 22, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 29, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 29, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 24, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 14, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 22, 2016 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 22, 2016 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 14, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 14, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 14, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 8, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 19, 2015 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 18, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |