USPTO serial 86821792
GENTLE BELLY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SONNEBORN, TRICIA L
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GENTLE BELLY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Francisco, CA
San Francisco, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Carrie L. Kiedrowski
CARRIE L. KIEDROWSKI Jones Day250 Vesey StreetNew York, NY 10281-1047UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Dietary supplemental drink mixes in liquid form; nutritional and dietary supplements formed and packaged as bars; powdered food supplements and capsulated food supplements; nutritional supplement energy bars; amino acids for nutritional purposes; beverages containing chlorophyll for use as a nutritional supplement; dietary and nutritional supplements for endurance sports; nutritional supplement meal replacement bars for boosting energy; vegan protein for use as a nutritional supplement in ready-to-drink beverages; liquid protein supplements; vegan liquid protein supplements; meal replacement in powder form adapted for medical use; meal replacement in liquid form adapted for medical use; meal replacement in drink form for weight loss purposes; dietary and nutritional supplements containing arabinoxylans | ACTIVE | — |
| 029 | Seed-based snack bars; seed-based snack foods; vegetable-based snack bars; vegetable-based snack foods; processed fruit-based snack bars; fruit-based snack foods; snack mix consisting of dehydrated fruit and processed nuts; protein based snack bar, namely, nut and seed-based snack bar; fruit-based and vegetable-based organic snack foods also containing vegan protein; fruit-based and vegetable-based organic snack foods also containing oat bran; fruit-based gluten-free snack foods; snack clusters consisting primarily of processed nuts, namely, shelled and roasted nuts; snack clusters consisting primarily of processed nuts, flavored nuts, and/or dried fruit; gluten free food, namely, organic, dried fruit-based snack clusters; fruit-based and vegetable-based meal replacement powder not for medical use | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Grain-based snack bars; grain-based snack foods; granola-based snack bars; granola-based snack foods; granola-based snack clusters; multi-grain based snack foods; protein cereal bars; cereal bars; high-protein cereal bars; ready-to-eat, cereal derived food bars; oatmeal; breakfast cereals; ready-to-eat cereals; bread; muffins; muffin mixes; bagels; mixes for making baking batters; dough; bread dough; pancake mixes; snack clusters consisting primarily of popped popcorn, processed grains, namely, puffed rice, oats, or quinoa, and/or chocolate, and also including processed nuts; snack clusters consisting primarily of popped popcorn, processed grains, namely, puffed rice, oats, or quinoa, and/or chocolate, and also including processed nuts and dried fruit | ACTIVE | — |
| 044 | Dietary and nutritional guidance | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Kaho Foods, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Kaho Foods, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 044
- Similar marks named GENTLE BELLY
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 16, 2018 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 15, 2018 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 11, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 11, 2017 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA E-MAILED | — |
| May 10, 2017 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 10, 2017 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 9, 2017 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 19, 2017 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 19, 2017 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 19, 2017 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 19, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 13, 2016 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 31, 2016 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 14, 2016 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 16, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 27, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 13, 2016 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 13, 2016 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2016 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2016 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 7, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 7, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 7, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 24, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 15, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 15, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 15, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 8, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 20, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 19, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |