Drawing for ORBBO

USPTO serial 86821982

ORBBO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MCCAULEY, BRENDAN D
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ORBBO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Stephen L. Humphrey

STEPHEN L. HUMPHREY CAMERON LLPSTE 1003818 CONNECTICUT AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20006

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Allograft materials, namely, human tissue based skin allograft; hemostatic sealants, namely, medical hemostatic paste, hemostatic gel matrix preparations for treating wounds and hemostatics for medical purposes; orthopedic implants comprising living tissueACTIVE—
010Robotic exoskeletal systems for medical use by humans, namely, robotic artificial limbsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 14, 2019MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 14, 2019ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 15, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 13, 2018EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jun 13, 2018EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jun 13, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 7, 2018CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Mar 12, 2018EWAFTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS—
Dec 15, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 13, 2017EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Dec 13, 2017EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Dec 13, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 11, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 10, 2017EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 5, 2017NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Oct 4, 2017TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Oct 4, 2017PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Oct 4, 2017PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Aug 28, 2017MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 28, 2017ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 26, 2017NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
Aug 25, 2017DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Aug 17, 2017IROARESPONSE TO ITU OFFICE ACTION ENTERED—
Aug 17, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 17, 2017INCDITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR DIVISIONAL REQUEST—
Jun 23, 2017AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jun 13, 2017EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 1, 2017DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Jun 1, 2017ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
May 10, 2017ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Dec 13, 2016NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 18, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 18, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 28, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Sep 13, 2016PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 8, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 1, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 1, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 1, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 24, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 24, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 24, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 24, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 22, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 20, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 19, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance