Drawing for EPIZON PHARMA, INC.

USPTO serial 86822672

EPIZON PHARMA, INC.

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
POWELL, LINDA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EPIZON PHARMA, INC.?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Craig M. Scott

Craig M. Scott HINCKLEY ALLEN & SNYDER LLP28 STATE STREETBOSTON, MA 02109-1775UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005pharmaceutical preparations for the treatment of vascular disease, cardiovascular disease, heart disease, osteoporosis, bone disease, renal disease, kidney disease, auto immune disease, arteriosclerosis, excluding devices or drug systems for the delivery of pharmaceuticals for the treatment of allergic reactions, anaphylaxis, or asthma and pharmaceuticals for the treatment of allergic reaction, anaphylaxis or asthmaACTIVE—
042development of pharmaceutical preparations and medicines; pharmaceutical products development; pharmaceutical research and development; research and development in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology fields; research in the field of pharmaceuticals and drugs, excluding devices or drug systems for the delivery of pharmaceuticals for the treatment of allergic reactions, anaphylaxis, or asthma and pharmaceuticals for the treatment of allergic reactions, anaphylaxis or asthmaACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 11, 2019MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 11, 2019ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 4, 2019CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Nov 29, 2018EWAFTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS—
May 29, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 25, 2018EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
May 25, 2018EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
May 25, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 29, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 27, 2017EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Nov 27, 2017EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Nov 27, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 2, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 31, 2017EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 31, 2017EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 31, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 31, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 5, 2017CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
May 1, 2017AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Apr 11, 2017EWAFTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS—
Dec 27, 2016NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 1, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Nov 1, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 12, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Sep 26, 2016PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 20, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 1, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 1, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 25, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 19, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 11, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 11, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 11, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 9, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 21, 2015MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Nov 20, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 20, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance