USPTO serial 86825222
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Charlene M. Krogh
CHARLENE M KROGH DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP1400 WEWATTA STREETSUITE 400 IP DEPARTMENTDENVER, CO 80202-5549| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer hardware, namely, WLAN (wireless local area network) controllers, wireless access point (WAP) devices; computer hardware and software for setting up and configuring local area networks; LAN (local area network) access points for connecting network computer users; WLAN (wireless local area network) operating software; Computer networking hardware; computer software for use in configuring, operating and maintaining WAPs, WLANs and LANs and for providing and maintaining wireless network connectivity to network computer users | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | Computer services, namely, hosting computer software applications on a computer network for others, cloud hosting provider services, hosting of websites, managing and maintaining websites for others, management of wireless networks for others, developing computer software, troubleshooting of computer software problems, maintenance of computer software and computer software applications, all in the fields of wireless communication, mobile information access, and remote data management for wireless delivery of content to handheld computers, laptops and mobile electronic devices; technical support services, namely, infrastructure management services for monitoring, administration and management of public and private cloud computing IT and application systems | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 26, 2016 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 26, 2016 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 26, 2016 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 26, 2016 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 19, 2016 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 21, 2016 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 24, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 24, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 4, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 22, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 21, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 21, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 17, 2016 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 17, 2016 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 10, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 10, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 10, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 10, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 25, 2015 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 24, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 21, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |