USPTO serial 86825244
VAN MEER´S
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 2, 2018
- Examiner
- FRISCH, HANNA CHO
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with VAN MEER´S?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Plus Government fees of $650
Owner
Distilleries Group Toorank B.V.
6902 PK ZEVENAAR, NL
Distilleries Group Toorank B.V.
6902 PK ZEVENAAR, NL
Distilleries Group Toorank B.V.
6902 PK ZEVENAAR, NL
ZEVENAAR, NL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Roberto Ledesma
Roberto Ledesma Law Office of Roberto LedesmaP.O. BOX 230692NEW YORK, NY 10023United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | Spirits and liqueurs | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Distilleries Group Toorank B.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Distilleries Group Toorank B.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Distilleries Group Toorank B.V.
- Other trademarks owned by TOORANK B.V.
- Other trademarks in Class 033
- Similar marks named VAN MEER´S
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 8, 2024 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2024 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Feb 8, 2024 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 7, 2023 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 2, 2023 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| May 8, 2019 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 2, 2018 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 29, 2017 | DP1B | 1(B) BASIS DELETED; PROCEED TO REGISTRATION | — |
| Oct 19, 2017 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Oct 19, 2017 | D1BR | TEAS DELETE 1(B) BASIS RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 22, 2017 | FIXD | ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 25, 2017 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 30, 2017 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 30, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 10, 2017 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2017 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 14, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 29, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 29, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 24, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 9, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 9, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 9, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 7, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 7, 2017 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 6, 2017 | OTHE | CASE RETURNED TO EXAMINATION | — |
| Feb 17, 2017 | MREI | NOTICE OF REINSTATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 16, 2017 | RG1B | REINSTATEMENT GRANTED - REQUEST TO DELETE 1(B) FILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2017 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 13, 2017 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 27, 2017 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 19, 2017 | GRML | CORRESPONDENCE E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 19, 2017 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 12, 2017 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Sep 16, 2016 | ERRR | ON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Sep 15, 2016 | DP1B | 1(B) BASIS DELETED; PROCEED TO REGISTRATION | — |
| Sep 15, 2016 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 8, 2016 | INOA | AMENDMENT AFTER NOA NOT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 8, 2016 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Sep 8, 2016 | D1BR | TEAS DELETE 1(B) BASIS RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 12, 2016 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 17, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 27, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2016 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 6, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 29, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 29, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 22, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 8, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 25, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 25, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 25, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 20, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 24, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 21, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |