USPTO serial 86827059
CIPU
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JACKSON, SHA-KARA ELOUISE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 120 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CIPU?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard C. Litman
RICHARD C. LITMAN BECKER & POLIAKOFF, P.A.8955 CENTER STREETMANASSAS, VA 20110UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | Air cooling apparatus; water heating equipment, namely, heat pumps, solar heaters, and gas heaters; water filter system for swimming pools; sanitary appliances and equipment in the nature of cleaning accessories for use in swimming pools; water cooling towers; lights, namely, lights for swimming pools; water softening apparatus and installations; hand showers; hand-held showers; plumbing fittings, namely, shower control valves; plumbing fixtures, namely, shower sprayers; shower control fittings, namely, escutcheons; shower doors; shower enclosures; shower faucet extensions; shower heads; shower panels; shower platforms; shower stands; showers; water purifying units, for potable water for swimming pools and spas; water softening units; water treatment equipment, namely, cartridge filtration units; water treatment equipment, namely, chemical sterilization units; water treatment equipment, namely, reverse osmosis filtration units; water treatment equipment, namely, ultraviolet sterilization units; water filtering units for swimming pools and spas use; water filters; water jets for use in swimming pools and spas; filtering units for swimming pools and spas; filters, heaters and pumps sold in combination for use in hot tubs; filters, heaters and pumps sold in combination for use in swimming pools; filters, heaters and pumps sold in combination for use in swimming pools and spas; coolant recovery systems, comprising swimming pool equipment, namely, pool filter, pool pump, pool ladder, pool light, pool cleaner, pool chlorinator, pool heater, and pool skimmer diverter; pool skimmer diverter; spas in the nature of heated pools; swimming pool chlorinating apparatus; swimming pool drain covers; swimming pool skimmer flow diverting weir for increasing the amount of debris drawn into the skimmer; swimming pool water cleaning and filtering units; drain structures for use in spas, steam rooms and baths | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 11, 2017 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Jul 19, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 19, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 23, 2016 | UNDC | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - COURTESY COPY MAILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2016 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2016 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2016 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 21, 2016 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 21, 2016 | UNDC | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - COURTESY COPY MAILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 16, 2016 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 16, 2016 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2016 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2016 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 9, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 9, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 6, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 24, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 21, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 21, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 21, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 14, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 25, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 24, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |