USPTO serial 86827373
KASTION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LORENZO, KATHLEEN H
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with KASTION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brent D. Sausser
BRENT D. SAUSSER THE LAW FIRM OF SAUSSER & SPURR, LLC2 ROSEDALE DRCHARLESTON, SC 29407-7242UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Chemical additives for antimicrobial purposes; Chemical additives for paints and surface coatings; Chemical additives for lacquers; Chemical additives for varnishes; Chemical additives for paint; Chemical additives for polymers; Fire retardant additives for plastics; Chemical additives for use in manufacture of paint, plastic and gel coats; Chemical additives for use in plastics; Chemical additives for the flow control of coatings; Chemical additives for the flow control of plastics; Chemical additives for use in the processing of plastics; Chemical additives for use in the production of coatings; Chemical additives for the protection of plastics against degradation; Chemical additives, namely, antimicrobial agents for use in manufacture of a wide variety of goods; Chemicals for use in industry having antimicrobial properties | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | Service of applying coatings; Treatment of materials for the manufacture of plastics goods; Treatment of materials for the manufacture of goods; Applying anti-bacterial coatings; Treatment of materials for the manufacture of paints | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 19, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 19, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 23, 2017 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2017 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2017 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 17, 2017 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 17, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 12, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 12, 2016 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 12, 2016 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2016 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2016 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 22, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 22, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 22, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 14, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 25, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 24, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |