USPTO serial 86827696
EROS & ATHENA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CLARK, ROBERT C
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with EROS & ATHENA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Richmond, IN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
H. Kim Sim
H. KIM SIM CONKLE, KREMER & ENGEL, PLC3130 WILSHIRE BLVD.SUITE 500SANTA MONICA, CA 90403Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Adhesives for artificial nails; Artificial fingernails; Bath bombs; Bath fizzies; Bath foam; Bath gels; Bath salts; Beauty balm creams; Cosmetic oils; Cosmetic preparations; Cosmetic preparations for bath and shower; Cosmetics; Face and body lotions; Nail care kits comprising nail polish; Nail care preparations; Nail cream; Nail glitter; Nail polish; Nail polish base coat; Nail polish remover; Nail polish top coat; Non-medicated body soaks; Non-medicated foot soaks; Non-medicated skin care preparations; Skin soap | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 11, 2016 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 11, 2016 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 14, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 14, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 14, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 14, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 26, 2015 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 25, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 24, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |