USPTO serial 86828879
THE JUNGLE BOOK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MARCY, AMY ALFIERI
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THE JUNGLE BOOK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
A. Minnie Alexander
A. Minnie Alexander The Walt Disney Company500 South Buena Vista StreetIP Department - Trademark GroupBurbank, CA 91521Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Action skill games; action figures and accessories therefore; board games; card games; children's multiple activity toys; badminton sets; balloons; basketballs; bath toys; baseball bats; baseballs; beach balls; bean bags; bean bag dolls; toy building blocks; bobblehead dolls; bowling balls; bubble making wand and solution sets; chess sets; children's play cosmetics; Christmas stockings; crib mobiles; crib toys; disc toss toys; doll clothing; doll accessories; electric action toys; equipment sold as a unit for playing card games; fishing tackle; footballs; golf balls; golf gloves; golf ball markers; amusement machines, namely, hand-held electronic game units adapted for use with an external display screen or monitor; hand held units for playing electronic games other than those adapted for use with an external display screen or monitor; hockey pucks; hockey sticks; infant toys; inflatable toys; jump ropes; kites; magic tricks; marbles; manipulative games; music box toys; parlor games; party favors in the nature of small toys; paper party favors; paper party hats; party games; playing cards; puppets; roller skates; role playing toys in the nature of play sets for children to imitate real life occupations; rubber balls; skateboards; snow boards; snow globes; soccer balls; spinning tops; squeeze toys; table tennis balls; table tennis paddles and rackets; table tennis tables; target games; teddy bears; tennis balls; tennis rackets; toy action figures and accessories therefore; toy bucket and shovel sets; toy mobiles; toy vehicles; toy scooters; toy cars; toy banks; toy trucks; toy watches; toy weapons; toy building structures and toy vehicle tracks; video game machines for use with televisions; volley balls; wind-up toys; yo-yos; toy trains and parts and accessories therefor; toy aircraft; fitted plastic films known as skins for covering and protecting electronic game playing apparatus, namely, video game consoles, and hand-held video game units | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 24, 2020 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 24, 2020 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 3, 2019 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2019 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 27, 2019 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2019 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 14, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2018 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 6, 2018 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2018 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 14, 2018 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2018 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 26, 2018 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 26, 2018 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 26, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 25, 2018 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 22, 2018 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2018 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 1, 2018 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2018 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 24, 2018 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 24, 2018 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 13, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2018 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 12, 2018 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 5, 2018 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2018 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 2, 2018 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 2, 2018 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 31, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 29, 2017 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 29, 2017 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 29, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 24, 2017 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 29, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 29, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 9, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 14, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 13, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 13, 2016 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 29, 2016 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2016 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 29, 2016 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 8, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 7, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 7, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 16, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 16, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 16, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 15, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 28, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 26, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |