Drawing for LA RENGIFO, MAS ALLA DEL BIEN Y DEL MAL

USPTO serial 86828970

LA RENGIFO, MAS ALLA DEL BIEN Y DEL MAL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MAYER, DAVID COREY
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 121 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with LA RENGIFO, MAS ALLA DEL BIEN Y DEL MAL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Ben Natter

BEN NATTER Haug Partners, LLP745 Fifth AvenueNew York, NY 10151UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Entertainment in the nature of ongoing television programs in the field of drama; entertainment services, namely, an ongoing multimedia program featuring a dramatic series distributed via various platforms across multiple forms of transmission mediaACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 7, 2018MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 7, 2018ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 9, 2018GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Feb 9, 2018GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 9, 2018CNFRSU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 7, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 7, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 7, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 30, 2018TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 29, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 28, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 28, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 28, 2017CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 14, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 13, 2017SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jul 13, 2017EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jul 2, 2017AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jun 21, 2017EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jun 21, 2017IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Jun 21, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 21, 2017EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Mar 16, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 22, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 20, 2016EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 20, 2016EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 20, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 30, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 30, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 21, 2016NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 26, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Apr 26, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 6, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Mar 15, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 15, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 30, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 26, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance